With regard to TEL-Tribes I’ve gone a bit anthropological. Not as in going back through the centuries because TEL-People are relatively new but other defining features of an anthropological study include physical characteristics, environmental and social relations, and above all, culture.
Two previous posts The Invisible Tribes and Territories of the TEL-People and Why don’t I speak French explored what it means to be
afflicted blessed with the acronym TEL. The story continues and today’s post is about communication.
TEL people speak a number of languages.
There are layers of technology language starting with code and ending with Help-desk-speak. TEL-People might be positioned anywhere on this continuum. Then there are the languages of teaching and of how students learn from multiple perspectives i.e. staff who teach and support learning, everyone else and students themselves. TEL-People need to be multi-lingual and segue from one to another in chameleon fashion. The problem is how the language of technology tends to align to a positivist view of the world while everyone else tends towards more interpretative approaches.
- Illegal object
- Address violation
- Bad Command
- Abort – Retry – Fail
- Well, it all depends what you mean by
- technology enhanced learning
- student engagement
- pedagogic innovation
- excellence in teaching
Where language complicates issues the TEL-People can get caught up in the misunderstandings of others. In a sector where words matter, there is a tendency for some to seek out a more obscure vocabulary in order to demonstrate their academic significance. At a time when more people than ever are being offered the opportunity to experience a higher education, should we not be seeking to simplify communication.
rather than complexify it.
There’s an art and a skill to clear writing. Not dumbing down but looking for ways to transmit messages unambiguously which don’t have the reader reaching for a dictionary or simply giving up. TEL-People tread a fine line between the binary approach of technology, black or white, yes or no, and the endless shades and permutations of educational research.
Academia is an environment which is always looking for new ways to say old things. On the CreativeHE Community this week the topic is Exploring Creative Pedagogies and Learning Ecologies. One question asked was the difference between ‘pedagogies‘ and ‘ecologies‘ compared to ‘creative teaching methods‘ and ‘learning environments‘. As a TEL-Person I thought they were different ways of saying the same things. Crossing disciplines in my work I see this often. Maybe by re-framing what we already have in new sets of clothes we can encourage people to review and rethink what has gone before. Or maybe it just alienates. This is the problem with language. Meaning and interpretation are not always the same and when it comes to learning and teaching the TEL-People have to be at home within the full range of potential possibilities.
It’s not too far a leap from the elitism of words to poetry. Yes, TEL-People can be poets too…
School nearly killed verse for me. Alexander Pope did not translate well to an inner city comprehensive. The curriculum today is more contemporary but for too many people school was the beginning and the end of poetry for pleasure and fun.
Sam Illingworth and I aim to change this. Every Friday lunch time we will be bringing you a poem to have with your sandwiches or chips. Subscribe to our site https://poetryfeedhe.wordpress.com or find us on Twitter #poetryfeedHE for opportunities to read, reflect and share your thoughts. Yes, PoetryfeedHE begins today.
‘You could do much worse than have lunch with a verse.’
We hope you’re hungry!